![]() The acting is terrible and flat(I guess Batman *wasn't* gay. Too little in this is rational why would the producer think a picture claiming that the Church is responsible for her prostitution would do well, wouldn't they barely be able to release it? Did these three earn a lot? I hear that this is the best, the one that is put together with most skill, and that is just depressing. Other than one, *maybe* two lines in this whole thing, the dialog is embarrassing and awful. I'm not saying something like this can't be smart, no, I'm pointing out that it insists that it can't be. That right there is way too complex and meta for this. you know, what the first of these movies were. ![]() This is about making a film out of the novel. Well, T&A, obviously, though hardly any of it is erotic or attractive(it seems to be played for laughs, instead). It has nothing to say(other than perhaps "Hollywood is sleazy", however, even in 1980, that was old news, downright ancient), it has no purpose, and other than camp, it has nothing to offer the viewer. I researched the woman and the book briefly before putting this on it's considered to be an important part of why sex became a less strained subject(although we appear to be moving backwards on that now, as more people are focusing on their careers than their love-lives), and I can certainly appreciate that. ![]() ![]() ![]() This is the only one in the series I've seen. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |